Setting up a cloud infrastructure is
not the issues, the only thing needs attention is the proper usage of all the
services. For this, one needs to start from the Proof of Concept stage and then
move towards the sustainable, stable
application. The only step that you can omit from the software development lifecycle (SDLC) is the requirement gathering. This is so because the department knows the
requirement.
The objective is to transform the entire system from legacy and distributed
platform to unified cloud computing. In this endeavor,
the first need is to determine the method
to set the cloud up. The process entails a big
deal of risk. After all, it’s not like changing the curtains of the window, and
it needs a careful shift.
Among several
methods available, the In-house
development and deployment is the most
appropriate in the view of safety and security of the information exposed to
the development team. The in-house team
can be restricted and controlled much easier
than a set of people working remotely at a vendor’s premises.
The foremost thing about using an in-house development setup is that the existing
subject matter experts can be used to write down requirements and test cases.
There is no need to spend weeks in chalking out the plans and priorities.
The people who are already part of
Department know well what information can be
revealed to the developers and what details should be masked.
When the environment is all set, the
new cloud computing programmers, database experts, network engineers, and technical
writers can be hired. Each of the newcomers can be assigned specific
roles under the supervision of existing experts. These existing experts may not
be aware of choosing the best model or great programming framework, but of course, they would be aware of expected output quality.
The most important reason why the in-house development is preferred over an outsourcing paradigm is the security. The new
developers can be made to sign the non-disclosure
agreement. Apart from this, their computers can be blocked with the internet
until the programs are ready. Restrictions on bringing storage media or phones
can be controlled so that the chances of
information leakage go out of the scene.
In-house development
ensures the security of work. It also
ascertains that the development is going
on the right track and everything is being
tested as per set standards. Developers and others have clarity of task
and experts know what to expect. This way the client and vendor both work in the
same cubicle,
thus there is no scope of deviation from the expected results. Department of
Defence manages sensitive information, and
this is why the in-house development
method will be appropriate.
In-house development
and deployment is dependent on internal
skills and availability of in-house resources
to develop new services. In-house
development and implementation should
reduce the learning curve on how to link to legacy services. With In-house
development and implementation, the
enterprise owns the cloud service and can add updates on the enterprise
timetable. In-house development and deployment offers
potentially tighter controls during the testing process. In-house, test managers can work closely with other IT and business leaders to ensure
complete testing is done.
No comments:
Post a Comment